The court's reasoning suggests that restrictions on the convenience of voting methods may be relatively permissible, while new burdens on in-person voting, whether a reduction in precincts or new voter identification requirements, might be more vulnerable.
source https://www.google.com/url?rct=j&sa=t&url=https://www.nytimes.com/2021/07/06/us/politics/supreme-court-voting-law.html&ct=ga&cd=CAIyGjJhZjcxZTMyNjk0YzRkZjQ6Y29tOmVuOlVT&usg=AFQjCNEe9ctsh0--GXwVuhkXnSo5dKo-2Q
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Featured post
Bennet, Hickenlooper, Polis Welcome Over $88 Million in Federal Transportation Grants for Colorado Projects
Washington, D.C. — Colorado U.S. Senators Michael Bennet and John Hickenlooper alongside Colorado Governor Jared Polis welcomed over $88 mil...
-
The Defense Department and Alaska Sen. Lisa Murkowski announced Wednesday that the Pentagon picked Anchorage as the site of the new Ted Stev...
-
Oceanographers modeled future marine biodiversity under different projected climate scenarios. They found that if emissions are not curbed, ...
-
For students, these mental health needs can go unsupported and lead to behaviors that are inconsistent with school expectations. It is impor...
No comments:
Post a Comment
We're away Reply You ASAP!