The court's reasoning suggests that restrictions on the convenience of voting methods may be relatively permissible, while new burdens on in-person voting, whether a reduction in precincts or new voter identification requirements, might be more vulnerable.
source https://www.google.com/url?rct=j&sa=t&url=https://www.nytimes.com/2021/07/06/us/politics/supreme-court-voting-law.html&ct=ga&cd=CAIyGjJhZjcxZTMyNjk0YzRkZjQ6Y29tOmVuOlVT&usg=AFQjCNEe9ctsh0--GXwVuhkXnSo5dKo-2Q
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Featured post
Bennet, Hickenlooper, Polis Welcome Over $88 Million in Federal Transportation Grants for Colorado Projects
Washington, D.C. — Colorado U.S. Senators Michael Bennet and John Hickenlooper alongside Colorado Governor Jared Polis welcomed over $88 mil...
-
A key priority of the CPF program is making funding available for broadband infrastructure to expand economic opportunities and provide high...
-
They discussed the situation in Israel and Gaza, and the urgent need to secure the release of Israeli hostages while alleviating the very re...
-
Washington, D.C. — Colorado U.S. Senators Michael Bennet and John Hickenlooper alongside Colorado Governor Jared Polis welcomed over $88 mil...
No comments:
Post a Comment
We're away Reply You ASAP!